Andrew Brown, writing for The Guardian, calls our attention today to the fact that His Holiness recently sent a message of support for the troops in Great Britain. Specifically, the Dalai Lama wrote to express his admiration for the soldiers next Saturday on Armed Forces Day.
Surprised?
Before you start to visualize the Dalai Lama as Commander-in-Chief of a vast Tibetan army, pay close attention to what he actually says in his message of commendation.
His first sentence is the most important one: "I have always admired those who are prepared to act in defense of others for the their courage and determination." In defense of . . . that's the crucial phrase. His Holiness has in mind here acts of self-defense, whether individually or nationally initiated. And I know what some will respond here, but I have never seen His Holiness or any Buddhist text, for that matter, equate pre-emptive and defensive. There's a big difference between repelling trouble and going out and looking for it.
In fact, while it is certainly true, as Brown's piece indicates, that Buddhism in the West has been watered down at times to a series of feel-good, New-Agey aphorisms, it is also true that undertaking violence in the Buddhist tradition is always treated like brain surgery: when it's time to undertake either one, it's best to leave it to the highly trained experts.
In the West, of course, we're quite happy to leave the surgery to those who have been trained in it, but as for violence, well, we'll entrust that to just about anybody. So at times, His Holiness will appear to accept certain acts of violence as being justifiable, but in those cases, he is always assuming that the perpetrator is one who is fully aware, during the entire process of conceiving and executing the violent action, of its complete karmic spectrum. That precludes a violent action being undertaken out of anger, jealousy, greed, selfishness, or attachment.
And to understand fully when those motivations are present in any action requires a kind of spiritual brain surgeon. Which most of us are not.
And those wrathful deities that Brown mentions, the ones you see scowling at you from Tibetan temples and thangkas? They are not advocating war or violence; they are simply manifesting in a visual form the energies needed to protect sacred knowledge from the compromising force of falsehood and misrepresentation.