A few numbers for you to consider, numbers from the past century's genocides: Armenians--1.5 million; Ukrainians--3 million; Jews--6 million; Russians--25 million; Chinese--25 million; Ibos--1 million; Bengalis--1.5 million; Cambodians--1.7 million; Burundians--250,000; Ugandans--500,000; Sudanese--2 million; Rwandans--800,000; North Koreans--1.7 million; Kosovars--10,000. (These figures are taken from Pioneers of Genocide Studies, eds., Totten, Samuel & Jacobs, Steven, 2002: p. 420).
So, over 70 million people programatically, consciously, deliberately, and with forethought slaughtered in the last century--nearly 25% of the American population.
You'll notice, of course, that the Tibetans (1.6 million) didn't make this list. Why? It's difficult to say. First, there are very specific definitions regarding the use of the term "genocide," and they are, of course, debated at the international level. You can see the founding document on genocide's definition here. Second, China's unique position in the global community as a developing world power (unlike many of the other nations who carried out genocidal policies) has encouraged other countries--potential business partners--to look the other way as China's oppressive policies have been implemented. Third, after the initial ten-year purge of Tibet, from 1949-1959, China began a program of population transfer that has directly threatened the existence of Tibetan culture.
China then has transformed its policies in Tibet from a widespread, decade-long slaughter, that may or may not qualify as genocide, to a systematic eradication of Tibetan culture through a programmatic population transfer, a kind of cultural genocide that does not appear in the U.N. document.
Still, the net result is that Tibetans and indigenous Tibetan culture are disappearing from the planet at an alarming rate.
What are we to do? The study of genocide, as a formal discipline and as opposed to Holocaust studies, is relatively new, beginning only in the early 80's. The number of scholars who have devoted themselves to this important subject is relatively small, but these scholars are deeply devoted to their cause, working not only at the university level--the familiar nesting ground of "scholars"--but also at the governmental level, and they have had a profound impact on our general awareness.
As concerned citizens, we must begin to understand the Tibetan issue within the larger context of human rights and the prevention of genocide. Working to familiarize ourselves with the larger goal, we create the full response to human suffering, avoiding the petty discriminations that privilege one group's suffering over another's and pit advocates of one group against advocates of another. Yet we ultimately must apply our full response to specific groups, and many of us have chosen to focus on the Tibetan cause.
To become effective advocates of the Tibetan cause, however, we must become knowledgeable students of geneocidal policies and the fundamental documents of human rights. To facilitate this process, I intend gradually to assemble a list of links on this site that will provide a bibliography for all of us to begin building the necessary knowledge base.
But the initial stages of this work begin at the conceptual level. Let me close with a quotation from Gregory Stanton, one of the pioneers of genocide studies; his thoughts on the changes that need to occur within each of us are, I believe, central to any transformation we might undertake regarding our perception of the rights of human beings everywhere:
I believe the international campaign to end genocide in the twenty-first century will some day be seen in the way we see the anti-slavery movement of the nineteenth century. It is time in human history to to end genocide, the worst of all crimes against humanity. There were those in the nineteenth century who said that slavery couldn't be ended because the economic forces that supported it were too great, that it was human nature, or even worse, that it was ordained by religion. There will be similar defeatism about the movement to abolish genocide. There has always been genocide, so it must be part of human nature. The world political order is not yet developed enough to prevent and stop it. Or, worst of all, genocide is ordained by jihad or ethnic purity or religion. But those who say we cannot abolish this curse upon mankind are no more right than those who said slavery could not be defeated. It is a matter of human will. And we make that human will.
And so we commit ourselves, here in the New Year, to begin the process of making that human will.